Skip to main content
· 2/20/2018

United States v. Rubio-Duran

Citations

  • 713 F. App'x 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that opinion work product “is entitled to virtually absolute protection”
  • rejecting argument that exclusion of reference to counsel deprives material of work product protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.