United States v. Ruben Perea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a detention using means more intrusive than necessary constitutes an arrest that must be supported by probable cause
• explaining that a detention using means more intrusive than necessary constitutes an arrest that must be supported by probable cause
• noting that, on a motion to suppress, the government bears the burden of showing that the requisite suspicion justified a stop
• explaining that searches incident to arrest and inventory searches of impounded property rely on different rationales
• finding that defendant, as bailee, had a privacy interest in duffel bag and had not abandoned privacy interest merely by placing bag in trunk of cab
• stating that use of police vehicles to impede mobility of suspect’s car “does not necessarily mean that, instead of a Terry stop, there was a de facto arrest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).