Skip to main content
· 5/13/1971

United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. Ivey

Citations

  • 441 F.2d 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court should have recognized jury trial right but also should have declared directed verdict; judgment affirmed because there was no issue for jury determination
  • court should have recognized jury trial right but also should have declared directed verdict; judgment affirmed because there was no issue for jury determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Dyer, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.