· 5/13/1971
United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. Ivey
Citations
- 441 F.2d 637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court should have recognized jury trial right but also should have declared directed verdict; judgment affirmed because there was no issue for jury determination
- court should have recognized jury trial right but also should have declared directed verdict; judgment affirmed because there was no issue for jury determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Dyer, Roney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.