United States v. Roy Eugene Carden, Winfred Eugene Carden, and Robert Lee Carden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, without the benefit of argument by the parties, that a petty larceny conviction was properly admitted for impeachment purposes, “since the crime at issue involved dishonesty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).