United States v. Roxanne Lumpkin, Mario Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that expert testimony is inadmissible “if it will usurp either the role of the trial judge in instructing the jury as to the applicable law or the role of the jury in applying that law to the facts before it” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
• applying Manson test when a detective displayed a single photograph to two undercover officers
• “Fundamental to the role of juror as trier of fact is the task of assessing witness credibility.”
• “A decision to exclude expert testimony rests soundly with the discretion of the trial court and shall be sustained unless manifestly erroneous.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).