United States v. Rousmaniere's Adm'rs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a case remained pending where the time to file a rehearing petition had not expired
• recognizing that the Superior Court and the District Court are both Article IV courts
• holding that Purcell is inapplicable when the relief sought is not injunctive
• explaining that this Court and the District Court are both Article IV courts deriving their authority ultimately from Congress
• noting that it is the substance of the court’s actions that are considered — rather than the label given to those actions by the court — when determining if a court has violated the Anti-Injunchon Act
• setting aside an order of the District Court only after concluding that it exceeded its jurisdiction in granting relief directly contrary to orders from this Court denying the same relief to the same party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).