Skip to main content
· 4/30/1990

United States v. Rothstein

Citations

  • 746 F. Supp. 748
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5056
  • 1990 WL 151113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a consumer does not have standing to sue under the DTPA
  • “[A] consumer does not have standing to [s]ue under the [0] DT-PA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.