United States v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where substitute 1 service is used, the person with whom the summons is left must also be a resident of the “usual 2 place of adobe”
• construing Rule 4(e)(2) and concluding that “the person with whom the summons is left must also be a resident of the ‘usual place of abode’”
• finding substitute service of process valid when the person serving process 26 declared, “he was informed by the security guard on duty that [plaintiff] . . . lived . . . at the 27 property”
• “Where substitute service is used, the person with whom the summons is left must also be a resident of the ‘usual place of abode.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shillitani v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
• United States v. Rylander
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLC
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-15· cited 291×
• Uphaus v. Wyman
  Supreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 164×
• General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-04-24· cited 150×
• Will Stone v. City And County Of San Francisco
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-08-25· cited 136×
• Burda Media, Inc. v. Viertel
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 116×
• The Stars' Desert Inn Hotel & Country Club, Inc. v. Richard Hwang
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-01-27· cited 56×
• In Re Crystal Palace Gambling Hall, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-05-20· cited 38×
• United States of America and Joe M. Wilson, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. William v. Held
  Sixth Circuit· 1970-12-17· cited 36×
• Go-Video, Inc. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-12-02· cited 15×
• DeFazio v. Wright
  D. New Jersey· 1964-05-12· cited 11×