United States v. Rosas-Herrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a policy or custom may be inferred by constitutional violations that are so “persistent and widespread” that they “practically have the force of law”
• holding that a policy or custom may be inferred by constitutional violations that are so “persistent and widespread” that they “practically have force of law”
• concluding that fact issues precluded district judge from granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Monell claim
• holding that a policy or custom may be inferred by constitutional violations that are so “persistent and widespread” that they “practically have force of law”
• reasonable for jury to find Monell liability for false arrest when there was evidence of eight similar arrests without probable cause
• reasonable for jury to find Monell liability when there was evidence of eight similar unconstitutional arrests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).