United States v. Roosevelt Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the mobility of the vehicle is not essential to the application of the automobile exception. . . . [T]he dimin- ished expectation of privacy alone is sufficient to No. 08-1151 15 conduct a search on probable cause.”
• Carney applies though car in custody and no longer mobile
• Carney applies though car in custody and no longer mobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).