United States v. Ronnie Moser and Carl Mullins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant who deliberately chooses not to learn what the substance was “so he could assert his ignorance if he was discovered with the substance in his possession,” is “chargeable with knowledge”
• under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) sufficiency of evidence of specific intent to possess and distribute LSD
• under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) sufficiency of evidence of specific intent to possess and distribute LSD
• specific intent in 21 U.S.C. § 841[a][l]; United States v. Yasser, 114 F.2d 558, 560 (3d Cir. 1940) (prede•cessor of 18 U.S.C. § 152; dicta); cf., United States v. Cooperative Grain and Supply Co., 476 F.2d 47, 59 (8th Cir. 1973
• specific intent in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)
• specific intent in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).