United States v. Ronnie Dean Purdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence the defendant smoked methamphetamine and marijuana contemporaneously with his possession of a firearm put him on notice he fell within the statutory definition of an “unlawful drug user.”
• holding the government must prove the defendant “took drugs with regularity, over an extended period of time” (emphasis added)
• explaining that an unlawful drug user is a person who “took drugs with regularity, over an extended period of time, and contemporaneously with his . . . possession of a firearm”
• finding that § 922(g)(3) is not unconstitutionally vague as applied
• rejecting a void-for-vagueness challenge and stating that “to sustain a conviction under § 922(g)(3
• rejecting a void- established that Augustin’s gun for-vagueness challenge and stating that possession and his isolated use of “to sustain a conviction under § marijuana were sufficiently close in time, 922(g)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).