Skip to main content
· 12/3/1996

United States v. Ronnell B. Randolph Willie Mitchell

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 607
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30999
  • 1996 WL 688795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where district court gave no explanation for its drug-quantity finding
  • remanding where district court gave no explanation for its drug-quantity finding
  • when sentencing court’s failure to chart path through disputed or equivocal evidence leaves appellate court unable to meaningfully review drug-quantity determination, remand is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Heaney, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.