Skip to main content
· 8/24/1982

United States v. Ronaldo Cedric Reed

Citations

  • 686 F.2d 651
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16374
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “we have nonetheless repeatedly rejected attacks on the Allen charges as per se coercive.”
  • “A supplemental instruction merely to continue deliberating after impasse . . . is not properly characterized as a -17- traditional Allen charge.” (citing Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 501–02 (1896))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Heaney, McMillian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.