Skip to main content
· 12/18/1987

United States v. Ronald William Pelton

Citations

  • 835 F.2d 1067
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16456
  • 1987 WL 23639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that petitioner was an educated man tends to support a finding that petitioner’s will was not overborne
  • stating that the governmental interest in gathering foreign intelligence is of “paramount importance” to national security interests
  • noting that in noncustodial interrogations, \the absence of Miranda warnings is one `factor' to be considered in assessing the voluntariness of a confession\
  • noting that \`a law enforcement officer may properly tell the truth to the accused'\ (quoting United States v. Williams, 479 F.2d 1138, 1140 (4th Cir. 1973)
  • holding FISA “compatible with the Fourth Amendment,” despite allowing surveillance on “less than traditional probable cause standard,” because “FISA’s numerous safeguards provide sufficient protection for the rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment”
  • travel-ling to Vienna and walking in a park for three days for the purpose of meeting a foreign agent constituted attempted espionage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Phillips, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.