United States v. Ronald Titlbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 8-month delay was not presumptively prejudicial “[g]iven the complexity of the conspiracy and the length of trial”
• finding that an eight-month delay was not presumptively prejudicial “[gjiven the complexity” of the case
• stating if no presumptively prejudicial delay exists, the court need not examine the remaining three Barker factors
• “A delay approaching a year may meet the threshold for presumptively prejudicial delay requiring application of the Barker factors”
• \A delay approaching a year may meet the threshold for presumptively prejudicial delay . . . .\
• “[A] delay approaching a year may meet the threshold for presumptively prejudicial delay . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).