Skip to main content
· 3/20/1973

United States v. Ronald Thomas Bohle

Citations

  • 475 F.2d 872
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We see no reason to extend the ‘fruits’ doctrine to testimony ‘impelled’ by mere evidentiary hearsay error, as distinct from unconstitutional police practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Mulligan, Timbers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.