· 12/19/2000
United States v. Ronald S. Carlson
Citations
- 235 F.3d 466
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10033
- 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7284
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33135
- 2000 WL 1847536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a conviction where the same affirmative act requirement instruction was used
- “[T]he six year limitations period in evasion of payment cases runs from the last act of evasion[.]”
- characterizing statute of limitations as “a procedural rule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Trott, Wardlaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.