Skip to main content
· 12/19/2000

United States v. Ronald S. Carlson

Citations

  • 235 F.3d 466
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10033
  • 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7284
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33135
  • 2000 WL 1847536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a conviction where the same affirmative act requirement instruction was used
  • “[T]he six year limitations period in evasion of payment cases runs from the last act of evasion[.]”
  • characterizing statute of limitations as “a procedural rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Trott, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.