Skip to main content
· 7/3/2013

United States v. Ronald Ritz

Citations

  • 721 F.3d 825
  • 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20152
  • 2013 WL 3336718
  • 76 ERC (BNA) 1813
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider appellant’s legal theory pre- sented for the first time on appeal where he attempted to “change his theory after losing below”
  • theories not presented by non-moving party at summary judgment are waived on appeal
  • theories not pre‐ sented by non‐moving party at summary judgment are waived on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.