United States v. Ronald Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no buyer-seller instruction was required in a case in which the evidence included phone logs, videotapes, audio recordings, and testimony from an informant and law enforcement officers
• finding sufficient evidence of a drug-distribution conspiracy in part because the defendant and his coconspirators beat up an individual who the defendant suspected of robbing his crack house
• finding sufficient evidence of a drug-distribution conspiracy in part because the defendant and his coconspira- tors beat up an individual who the defendant suspected of robbing his crack house
• “questions are not ‘statements’ and therefore are not hearsay”
• \[Q]uestions are not 'statements' and therefore are not hearsay.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).