United States v. Ronald Lorenzo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an Allen charge was not inherently coercive even though jury was split 11-1 because the judge did not know the identity of the holdout juror
• holding that an Allen charge was not inherently coercive even though jury was split 11-1 because the judge did not know the identity of the holdout juror
• holding that an Allen charge was not inherently coercive even though jury was split 11-1 because the judge did not know the identity of the holdout juror
• stating that we review de novo the district court’s ruling on entrapment, as a matter of law
• identifying all of these factors as relevant in determining whether instruction was coercive
• identifying all of these factors as relevant in determining whether instruction was coercive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).