United States v. Ronald Lofton, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Lofton would have no standing to appeal the district court’s determination that his wife waived her spousal testimonial privilege”
• stating that we review a district court’s decision regarding the existence of an evidentiary privilege for abuse of discretion
• observing that the spousal testimonial privilege “applies to all testimony against a defendant- spouse, including testimony on nonconfidential matters and matters which occurred prior to the marriage”
• observing that the spousal testimonial privilege “applies to all testimony against a defendant- spouse, including testimony on nonconfidential matters and matters which occurred prior to the marriage”
• observing that the spousal testimonial privilege “applies to all testimony against a defendant- spouse, including testimony on nonconfidential matters and matters which occurred prior to the marriage”
• observing that the spousal testimonial privilege “applies to all testimony against a defendant- spouse, including testimony on nonconfidential matters and matters which occurred prior to the marriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).