United States v. Ronald Lee Wulferdinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was insufficient time to procure a telephone warrant in compliance with California Penal Code sections 1526, 1528 (West 1982
• holding that there was insufficient time to procure a telephone warrant in compliance with California Penal Code sections 1526, 1528 (West 1982
• “common practice for drug dealers to place the courier under surveillance;” onlookers to public arrest may report to suppliers
• exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where confederate’s failure to return to premises, due to arrest, might cause those inside to dispose of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).