United States v. Ronald J. Smith, James J. Marren, and Gerald T. Louison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that uncorroborated direct testimony of an accomplice is sufficient for purposes of Rule 404(b) unless it is \incredible on its face or otherwise insubstantial\
• evidence properly admitted where two years separated the prior act and the charged acts
• any prejudice to defendant was limited by jury instruction advising jury that prior acts could only be considered on the issue of knowledge and intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).