United States v. Ronald J. Klump

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the general rule that resentencing is de novo applies” absent limiting language
• concluding that a sentence imposed after the first federal sentence but before resentenc‐ ing did not violate its rule against considering post‐sentencing conduct because the conduct which formed the basis for the intervening sentence pre‐dated the initial sentencing
• stating in dicta that \resentencing on remand is de novo but the court may not consider post-sentencing conduct or conduct beyond the scope of a limited remand\
• allowing court to consider a state law sentence that had been imposed in the interval between defendant's original sentence and resentencing, resulting in a higher sentence for the defendant
• “[T]he general rule that resentencing is de novo applies and the court correctly found that the state sentence was a ‘prior sentence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).