Skip to main content
· 3/25/1994

United States v. Ronald Hodge

Citations

  • 19 F.3d 51
  • 305 U.S. App. D.C. 204
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing conviction where trial court limited defendant’s right to fully confront and cross-examine government witnesses at pretrial suppression hearing
  • a suppression hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution and \any limitations on the right of cross-examination . .. must be justified by weighty considerations\
  • a suppression hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution and \any limitations on the right of cross-examination . . . must be justified by weighty considerations\
  • a suppression hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution and \any limitations on the right of cross-examination . . . must be justified by weighty considerations\
  • the Ninth Circuit refused to extend to motions to dismiss the 20 requirement that a district court examine the merits of an unopposed motion for summary 21 judgment before summarily granting it pursuant to a local rule
  • “The Rules of evidence do not generally apply to suppression hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Buckley, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.