Skip to main content
· 12/13/2004

United States v. Ronald Hamilton, AKA Seal O

Citations

  • 391 F.3d 1066
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25614
  • 2004 WL 2848354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel at “critical stage[s]” of criminal proceedings is not subject to plain error analysis
  • holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel at \critical stage[s]\ of criminal proceedings is not subject to plain error analysis
  • recognizing that a pre-trial hearing regarding admissibility of evidence is a critical stage of the proceeding
  • holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel at “critical stage[s]” of criminal proceedings is not subject to plain error analysis
  • holding that “[w]e only review for plain error or assess whether an error is harmless when the error is not structural”
  • holding a suppression hearing was a \critical stage\ of the proceeding as it bore on \evidence relating to [the defendant's] case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Hansen, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.