United States v. Ronald Glinton, Morris McFadden Timothy Hatten, Lavon Heath, Albert Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no prejudice when the defendants were “fairly apprised” of the charged activity and had an opportunity to present a defense to a trial
• “federal courts must defer to state law on the question of the validity of wiretap orders obtained by state law enforcement officers in state courts”
• “[w]hen the proof at trial reveals the existence of more than one conspiracy, the adequacy of the trial judge’s instructions are of critical importance in evaluating the likelihood that confusion or prejudice resulted from transference of guilt from one conspiracy to another”
• powder cocaine to cocaine base
• powder cocaine to cocaine base

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).