Skip to main content
· 1/7/1994

United States v. Ronald Frank Vaughan

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 1186
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 154
  • 1994 WL 2791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that guilty plea forecloses double jeopardy claim unless breach of prior plea agreement is “apparent ‘on the face of the record’”
  • holding that guilty plea forecloses double jeopardy claim unless breach of prior plea agreement is \apparent 'on the face of the record' \
  • explaining Supreme Court precedent dictates a guilty plea may foreclose a double jeopardy claim unless it is clear from the face of the record that the court had no power to enter conviction or impose a sentence
  • “A defendant’s knowing and intelligent guilty plea forecloses independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Fagg, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.