United States v. Ronald Fisher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that an otherwise enforceable waiver of appellate rights is not rendered ineffective by a district judge’s post- sentencing advice suggesting, or even stating, that the defendant may appeal”
• contrasting the Rule 32 requirements for a post-plea, as opposed to a post-trial, defendant
• “If enforceable when entered, the waiver does not lose its effectiveness because the district judge gives the defendant post-sentence advice inconsistent with the waiver. No justifiable reliance has been placed on such advice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).