United States v. Romeo Romualdi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that “[b]oth the relevant statute and the Sentencing Guidelines make a distinction between receipt and possession of child pornography”
• remarking that “[b]oth the relevant statute and the Sentencing Guidelines make a distinction between receipt and possession of child pornography”
• remarking that “[b]oth the relevant statute and the Sentencing Guidelines make a distinction between receipt and possession of child pornography”
• \[A] district court by definition abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).