United States v. Roman Nektalov, Eduard Nektalov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the conscious avoidance instruction because the defendant deliberately avoided asking the undercover agent any questions that might have confirmed his suspicions that the cash used in their transactions constituted the proceeds of illegal activity
• \[D]efendant's affirmative efforts to 'see no evil' and 'hear no evil' do not somehow magically invest him with the ability to 'do no evil.' \ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “We review evidentiary rulings for abuse of the district court’s broad discretion, reversing only when the court has acted arbitrarily or irrationally.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).