Skip to main content
· 5/20/2014

United States v. Rollings

Citations

  • 751 F.3d 1183
  • 2014 WL 2061667
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining first two elements of plain error require showing “(1) an error; (2) that is plain” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • where only appellate waiver provi- sion is challenged, appellate court not obligated to consider validity of other parts of agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.