· 5/20/2014
United States v. Rollings
Citations
- 751 F.3d 1183
- 2014 WL 2061667
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining first two elements of plain error require showing “(1) an error; (2) that is plain” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- where only appellate waiver provi- sion is challenged, appellate court not obligated to consider validity of other parts of agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Seymour, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.