Skip to main content
· 2/22/1882

United States v. Roliger

Citations

  • 27 F. Cas. 893
  • 28 Int. Rev. Rec. 314
  • 1882 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the velification requirement of 5 V I C § 1302(3) is a claims processing rule
  • holding that the Superior Court can refuse to issue the writ for claims that are procedurally barred
  • stating that “the Virgin Islands territorial government is a subdivision of the United States government_”
  • explaining that “empanelled jurors are not presumed to be prejudiced or unqualified”
  • refusing to review the trial court’s empanelment of a biased juror for harmless error
  • addressing similar use of disjunctive in Virgin Islands habeas corpus statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Treat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.