United States v. Rolando Stockton, United States of America v. Rolando Stockton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the correction of a plain error \remains within the discretion of the appellate court\
• explaining that the Government had not violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights by noting in closing argument his decision not to call an allegedly exculpatory witness because both the defendant and the witness had testified
• also concluding that this change to the standard of review did not raise Ex Post Facto Clause concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).