United States v. Rolando Araujo, Sr., and Antonio Araujo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is a “duty under Rule 23(b) to ascertain the likely duration of a missing juror’s absence before dismissing him or her,” and that the district court had not determined how long car trouble would delay the juror

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).