United States v. Roland Ogbogu Oba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that invocation was limited to advice of counsel concerning effect of x-ray consent form on potential civil action
• concluding there was no Edwards violation where suspect “initiated further discussion” concerning the topic covered by his limited invocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).