United States v. Roland M. Silva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a mere command, without submission by a defendant, would not constitute a seizure under Supreme Court precedent
• being in company of known felon and subsequent flight from police gave rise to reasonable suspicion
• applying Taylor reasoning and holding that defendant's burglary convictions indicate he was found guilty of all essential elements comprising generic burglary
• considering “companionship with or propinquity to” a suspect in the reasonable suspicion calculus
• considering “companionship with or propinquity to” a suspect in the reasonable suspicion calculus
• “[A] suspect’s companionship with or propinquity to an individual independently suspected of criminal activity is a factor to be considered in assessing the reasonableness of a seizure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).