United States v. Rojas-Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding great significance, for determining that accused should have received Article 31 warnings, in the fact that questioning began after the accused was back in the manager’s office
• Art. 31 warning requirement applicable to civilian base-exchange detective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).