United States v. Rohleder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a penalty was appropriate for the fraud associated with respect to each of sixteen contracts but not for each of the ninety purchase orders submitted with the contracts
• affirming the award of penalties where “[t]he government offered no evidence of actual damage at the trial and sought only to recover the statutory forfeitures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).