United States v. Rogers Lockett, III A/K/A Manny Strong Rogers Lockett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant “cannot now ask to re-bargain the waiver of his right to appeal because of changes in the law”
• stating that “in the context of a motion to suppress, a defendant must have advanced substantially the same theories of suppression in the district court as he or she seeks to rely upon in this Court”
• stating that “in the context of a motion to suppress, a defendant must have advanced substantially the same theories of suppression in the district court as he or she seeks to rely upon in this Court”
• rejecting argument that appeal. waiver was unknowing “because [defendant] did not know at the time he pleaded guilty that the Supreme Court would later hold [in Booker ] that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory”
• rejecting argument that appeal waiver was unknowing \because [defendant] did not know at the time he pleaded guilty that the Supreme Court would later hold [in Booker] that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory\
• \The record reflects that Lockett knowingly and voluntarily bargained for his plea agreement. He cannot now ask to re-bargain the waiver of his right to appeal because of changes in the law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).