United States v. Rogers Butler, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an act of physical confinement beyond detention is required for a defendant to be in custody at a border checkpoint
• holding that an act of physical confinement beyond detention is required for a defendant to be in custody at a border checkpoint
• holding that an act of physical confinement beyond detention is required for a defendant to be in custody at a border checkpoint
• holding that an act of physical confinement beyond detention is required for a defendant to be in custody at a border checkpoint
• holding that “mere detention of a person in a border station’s security office from which he or she is not free to leave, while a search of a vehicle occurs, is not ‘custody’ for these purposes”
• finding that the fact that an officer does not believe that he has probable cause to make an arrest does not control the \in custody\ determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).