Skip to main content
· 8/13/2013

United States v. Roger Rouland

Citations

  • 726 F.3d 728
  • 2013 WL 4080720
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that prolonged hearings may lead to “perverse consequences in busy districts”
  • upholding practice in which the government moves at sentencing to admit an exhibit listing special conditions, even though the court does not individually recite them
  • accepting defendant's concession that an unpronounced special condition did not affect his substantial rights, as necessary for reversal under plain error review
  • “[S]pecial conditions may be tantamount to standard conditions under the appropriate circumstances, thereby precluding the need for an oral pronouncement.”
  • “[S]pecial conditions may be tantamount to standard conditions under the appropriate circumstances, thereby precluding the need for an oral pronouncement.”
  • applying plain-error review because the exhibit provided notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Higginbotham, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.