United States v. Roger Rebbe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the admissibility of the proffer statements was triggered if Rebbe or his attorney presented any evidence or made any arguments and/or representations at trial that were inconsistent with his proffer statements”
• where defendant presented a 3 defense that was inconsistent with proffer statements, district court did not err in admitting proffer statements
• where defendant presented a 3 defense that was inconsistent with proffer statements, district court did not err in admitting proffer statements
• upholding admission of proffer statements in rebuttal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).