United States v. Roger P. Reetz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• application of two sentencing enhancements which consider different aspects of defendant's conduct and represent different concerns does not amount to double counting
• application of two enhancements did not constitute double counting because they considered different aspects of defendant's conduct and represented different concerns
• plaintiff was not entitled to benefits because an intervening federal 19 regulation disqualified any person with diabetes from operating a commercial motor vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).