· 10/22/1976
United States v. Roger L. Whitesel
Citations
- 543 F.2d 1176
- 38 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6121
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that claims challenging the federal government monetary system are “clearly frivolous”
- explaining that claims challenging the government’s monetary system are “clearly frivolous”
- trial court has discretion to permit lay representation but only where lay representative was sufficiently learned in the law to adequately represent the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, McCree, Lively
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.