United States v. Roger Franklin Cothran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “§ 3582(c)(2) and related sentencing guidelines do not contemplate a full de novo resentencing”
• holding that a district court may not revisit a prior drug amount determination in § 3582(c)(2) proceedings
• holding that S 3582(c)(2) does not contemplate a full de novo resentencing
• holding the district court correctly declined to re-examine the number of marijuana plants involved in the drug offense
• noting that the district court is not free, under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), to reexamine the factual determination of the number of marijuana plants attributed to the defendant
• noting that the district court is not free, under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), to reexamine the factual determination of the number of marijuana plants attributed to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).