Skip to main content
· 6/21/2016

United States v. Rodriguez-Raymundo

Citations

  • 667 F. App'x 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to strike sections of complaint asserting punitive damages, because pleadings did not meet high bar for punitive damages in non-fraud case of breach of fiduciary duty
  • “The Court need not reach the choice-of-law issue here to decide [defendant's] motion to dismiss.”
  • defendants prior disclosure of the substance of the alleged omission to the market rendered an omission immaterial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Jones, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.