United States v. Rodriguez-Quintanilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that some cases apply an \abuse of discretion” standard while others apply a \plainly unreasonable” standard
• stating that under § 3584(a) “a district court has the discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences”
• explaining that “sentencing a defendant to consecutive sentences following the revocation of supervised release is not unreasonable”
• upholding sentence for revocation of supervised release added consecutively to sentence for illegal reentry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).