United States v. Rodriguez-Laguna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Mr. Sterling’s argument that he had transferred all his property to the United States where his “proof’ of the transfer was various documents and UCC filings he had prepared, published and recorded alleging that he assigned property to the United States of America
• “a lift stay motion cannot be brought by a stranger to the case.” (quoting In re Escobar, 457 B.R. 229, 239 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2011)
• “[A] scheme warranting § 362(d)(4) relief implies a level of insidiousness or deceitfulness.”
• holder of note or mortgage is a party in interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).